
  
|
 |
| Framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science, A |
|
Journal Article
|
|
|
|
Authors: |
B.L. Turner II
Roger E. Kasperson
Pamela A. Matson
James J. McCarthy
Robert W. Corell
Lindsey Christensen
Noelle Eckley
|
Jeanne X. Kasperson
Amy Luers
Marybeth L. Martello
Colin Polsky
Alexander Pulsipher
Andrew Schiller
|
 |
Published by |
PNAS,
Volume 100, pages 8074-8079
July 8, 2003
Publication Number
14
|
|
|
Global environmental change and sustainability science increasingly recognize the need to address the consequences of changes taking place in the structure and function of the biosphere. These changes raise questions such as: Who and what are vulnerable to the multiple environmental changes underday, and where? Research demonstrates that vulnerability is registered not by exposure to hazards (perturbations and stresses) along but also resides in the sensitivity and resilience of the system experiencing such hazards. This recognition requires revisions and enlargements in the basic design of vulnerability assessments, including the capacity to treat coupled human-environment systems and those linkages within and without the systems that affect their vulnerability. A vulnerability framework for the assessment of coupled human-environment systems is presented.
|
|
|
|
Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies |
B.L. Turner II, Pamela A. Matson, James J. McCarthy, Robert W. Corell, Lindsey Christensen, Noelle Eckley, Grete K. Hovelsrud-Broda, Jeanne X. Kasperson, Roger E. Kasperson, Amy Luers, Marybeth L. Martello, Svein Mathiesen, Rosamond L. Naylor, Colin Polsky, Alexander Pulsipher, Andrew Schiller, Henrik Selin, Nicholas Tyler
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
vol.
100, 14
(2003)
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|